Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 22:36:05 10/04/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 04, 2003 at 17:08:36, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On October 04, 2003 at 17:06:40, Uri Blass wrote: > >>I think that winning with 1.h3 is not harder than winning with 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d6 >>and 1.h3 was mentioned by vincent as an example of a stupid line. > >One reason why this comparison makes no sense is that the first line >is for white and the second one is for black. > >But let's try again: > >You'd like 1.e4 h6 just as well as 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d6? > >-- >GCP The comparison makes sense: he's claiming he would not prefer having black after 1. e4 c6 2. d4 d6 to having white after 1. h3. Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.