Computer Chess Club Archives




Subject: Re: a question to Tord about detecting threats in null move

Author: Dave Gomboc

Date: 22:36:05 10/04/03

Go up one level in this thread

On October 04, 2003 at 17:08:36, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:

>On October 04, 2003 at 17:06:40, Uri Blass wrote:
>>I think that winning with 1.h3 is not harder than winning with 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d6
>>and 1.h3 was mentioned by vincent as an example of a stupid line.
>One reason why this comparison makes no sense is that the first line
>is for white and the second one is for black.
>But let's try again:
>You'd like 1.e4 h6 just as well as 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d6?

The comparison makes sense: he's claiming he would not prefer having black after
1. e4 c6 2. d4 d6 to having white after 1. h3.


This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.