Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Rebel 12 engine parameters

Author: Thorsten Czub

Date: 03:48:50 10/05/03

Go up one level in this thread


On October 05, 2003 at 06:10:34, Frank Meißen wrote:

>I have some questions about a proper description of the
>Rebel-Win-Engineparameters.
>The web-pages of Rebel only shows some Rebel12-DOS-Parameters, but no
>explanation of most of the pruning methods.
>
>Is it still possible to use "[Search Technique = OVERNIGHT]" for long analysis?
>
>Also I don't understand why Rebel-Win has "[EVALUATION = NORMAL]" although in
>Rebel-DOS "[EVALUATION = SMART] * proven improvement, do not change." is
>mentioned.
>
>Thanks in advance for any comments
>Frank

ed's comment about "PROVEN IMPROVEMENT" was imo a early written down.

Later testing showed that NORMAL was better .

Sometimes you find out things very late.

concnering other techniques then nullmove, thats what i do test too in the
moment.

IMO there is something wrong with Ed's implementation of Nullmove.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.