Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 03:48:50 10/05/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 05, 2003 at 06:10:34, Frank Meißen wrote: >I have some questions about a proper description of the >Rebel-Win-Engineparameters. >The web-pages of Rebel only shows some Rebel12-DOS-Parameters, but no >explanation of most of the pruning methods. > >Is it still possible to use "[Search Technique = OVERNIGHT]" for long analysis? > >Also I don't understand why Rebel-Win has "[EVALUATION = NORMAL]" although in >Rebel-DOS "[EVALUATION = SMART] * proven improvement, do not change." is >mentioned. > >Thanks in advance for any comments >Frank ed's comment about "PROVEN IMPROVEMENT" was imo a early written down. Later testing showed that NORMAL was better . Sometimes you find out things very late. concnering other techniques then nullmove, thats what i do test too in the moment. IMO there is something wrong with Ed's implementation of Nullmove.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.