Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 04:50:10 10/05/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 05, 2003 at 06:48:50, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On October 05, 2003 at 06:10:34, Frank Meißen wrote: > >>I have some questions about a proper description of the >>Rebel-Win-Engineparameters. >>The web-pages of Rebel only shows some Rebel12-DOS-Parameters, but no >>explanation of most of the pruning methods. >> >>Is it still possible to use "[Search Technique = OVERNIGHT]" for long analysis? >> >>Also I don't understand why Rebel-Win has "[EVALUATION = NORMAL]" although in >>Rebel-DOS "[EVALUATION = SMART] * proven improvement, do not change." is >>mentioned. >> >>Thanks in advance for any comments >>Frank >ed's comment about "PROVEN IMPROVEMENT" was imo a early written down. >Later testing showed that NORMAL was better . Really... well, your words, not mine. >Sometimes you find out things very late. >>concnering other techniques then nullmove, thats what i do test too in the >moment. >IMO there is something wrong with Ed's implementation of Nullmove. You lose a few games against Fritz, you need a stick to beat, guess what? It's Rebel's nullmove! Seldom have seen you posting so much nonsense :) Ed
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.