Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 05:12:58 10/05/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 05, 2003 at 07:50:10, Ed Schröder wrote: >>Later testing showed that NORMAL was better . > >Really... well, your words, not mine. :-)) >You lose a few games against Fritz, you need a stick to beat, guess what? It's >Rebel's nullmove! i am searching the source for rebel making strange moves that lose the game in an instant. first i thought: its the reductions. then i thought it is the selectivity. now i think it could be nullmove. as long as YOU cannot explain WHY rebel loses a game with a very strange move that looks like a serious blunder, i will search for new REASONS. >Seldom have seen you posting so much nonsense :) > >Ed :-)) the PROVEN IMPROVEMENT of your older styles was, that the strength was improved against rebel.eng or rebelxp.eng. but the improvement did not work against fritz/shredder/hiarcs/tiger15/... so this is not really an improvement overall. i do appreciate that people experiment with all kind of settings. IMO this gives us material to learn about rebel engine. how do YOU explain those blunder moves happen ?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.