Author: Rex
Date: 05:21:28 10/05/03
Go up one level in this thread
Ed, Sounds to me like its time for yet another "Personality Contest." Like the one you had a few years ago!! On October 05, 2003 at 07:50:10, Ed Schröder wrote: >On October 05, 2003 at 06:48:50, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>On October 05, 2003 at 06:10:34, Frank Meißen wrote: >> >>>I have some questions about a proper description of the >>>Rebel-Win-Engineparameters. >>>The web-pages of Rebel only shows some Rebel12-DOS-Parameters, but no >>>explanation of most of the pruning methods. >>> >>>Is it still possible to use "[Search Technique = OVERNIGHT]" for long analysis? >>> >>>Also I don't understand why Rebel-Win has "[EVALUATION = NORMAL]" although in >>>Rebel-DOS "[EVALUATION = SMART] * proven improvement, do not change." is >>>mentioned. >>> >>>Thanks in advance for any comments >>>Frank > >>ed's comment about "PROVEN IMPROVEMENT" was imo a early written down. >>Later testing showed that NORMAL was better . > >Really... well, your words, not mine. > > >>Sometimes you find out things very late. >>>concnering other techniques then nullmove, thats what i do test too in the >>moment. > >>IMO there is something wrong with Ed's implementation of Nullmove. > >You lose a few games against Fritz, you need a stick to beat, guess what? It's >Rebel's nullmove! > >Seldom have seen you posting so much nonsense :) > >Ed
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.