Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Tournament results

Author: blass uri

Date: 09:19:43 11/07/98

Go up one level in this thread



On November 07, 1998 at 09:17:47, Thorsten Czub wrote:

>On November 06, 1998 at 23:56:57, Mark Young wrote:
>
>>>            H7b    J5     R10    F5     TOTAL    %   Played
>>>Hiarcs 7b   ---     4      7      8      19    63.3    30
>>>Junior 5     6     ---     5     4.5    15.5   51.7    30
>>>Rebel 10     3      5     ---    5.5    13.5   45.0    30
>>>Fritz 5      2     5.5    4.5    ---     12    40.0    30
>
>Your results is exactly what i get , my results are a little weaker for fritz,
>would say 35-40% when I play with my fritz5 manually.
>
>So YOUR fritz is not stronger than mine ! :-)))
>
>Only when you let it play in sweden, it gets better elo's.

Fritz5 did not play in sweden against these strong opponents and they are not at
the least(Junior5 is going to be in the least and I think it is going to be in
the first place in the next ssdf list)

>
>>>- Fritz 5 simply didn't have a chance and was outplayed by H7b in all phases of
>>>the game. Fritz drew 4 games, lost 6 and won none.
>
>This is exactly what the normal customer gets. what we all get when we buy it
>legally and for money, and of course this disapoints any customer.

Fritz5 scored less than 50% against Hiarcs6 in the ssdf games and Hiarcs7 is
better than hiarcs6.
I do not think that this dissapoint any customer because most of the customers
did not buy fritz5 because of the first place in the ssdf list but because of
other reasons.

You can use it for training  and there are many interesting options in this
program.

It is also an engine for some good programs like hiarcs and now nimzo.






>This will hopefully explain why the customers get betrayed...
I do not feel betrayed by chessbase



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.