Computer Chess Club Archives




Subject: Re: a question to Tord about detecting threats in null move

Author: Vincent Diepeveen

Date: 11:43:56 10/05/03

Go up one level in this thread

On October 05, 2003 at 03:12:28, Ed Schröder wrote:

>On October 04, 2003 at 21:24:07, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>>You were never good in quoting.
>>Show me.
>I am sure there are enough members here who remember your silly claims, DIEP was
>the strongest analyze program of the world, your own words. At the time it gave
>a nice and juicy discussion where you made a clown of yourself. It's all
>recorded in Google, RGCC, 1997.

You are good in changing realities. Show things don't say cheap things.

>Point is, you were calling Uri a clown which is not very brotherly and that is
>softly speaking, in fact it was quite humiliating. So I gave some taste of your
>own medicine.

Uri is the clown of himself. I understand because you retired that you do not
read much postings at CCC, if you would your opinion would qualify Uri not
exactly as your brother, unless you mean 'brother in evil'.

He's not even having the same religion like you have Ed!

>>You're even telling me back in 1997 that Rebel didn't rely for
>>positional scores at piece square tables. I was at the time forced by you to
>>correct it in my homepage.
>>Even in 2003 we can proof rebel is a preprocessor though :)
>>It is sad that your quoting is very limited. Not even in your homepage what is
>>in Rebel is quoted correctly.
>>It is real sad.
>Surely the best defense is to counter attack :-) but dear Vince I have never
>denied there is some (1-2%) pre-processor stuff in Rebel.

1-2%. Bullshit. Without preprocessor Rebel loses everything.

>Please try again, but pick something better.... :)
>My best,

This page took 0.12 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.