Author: G.M. Yates
Date: 22:42:25 10/05/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 06, 2003 at 00:34:57, K. Burcham wrote: >On October 06, 2003 at 00:09:57, G.M. Yates wrote: > >>For Humans Only! >> >>Mates are usually too easy for computers! >> >>r4r2/2p2pk1/b1n1pN2/p1p1P1B1/2p5/5R2/PPB3PP/RN4K1 w >> >> >> >>Morphy,P - Carr >>Blindfold Game, 1858 > >no humans at this site. I think some humans read here, but not very often does a >human actually post here. those that post here are mostly programmers, >chipheads, chess gamers, code geeks, overclockers, and software freaks. > >so mate positions that are challenging for GM but are very simple for chess >programs will not get much interest here. I tried your position with BamBam, >List, and Doctor 3.0, all could see mate in 0 time. > >kburcham Very Funny.....Of course a program can find this mate fast...it was posted for fun, for anyone...and no this isn't a challenge for a G.M. either. I know there are not many G.M.s that post at this forum. A few more may read it. Hey, G.M.s keep abreast on Computer Chess as well....we have too, the programs are now competing with us! Know your competition, even computers!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.