Author: Gerd Isenberg
Date: 22:51:25 10/05/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 05, 2003 at 14:36:37, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On October 05, 2003 at 13:44:32, Gerd Isenberg wrote: > >>On October 05, 2003 at 09:56:56, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >> >>>On October 05, 2003 at 08:59:59, Sune Fischer wrote: >>> >>>>On October 05, 2003 at 07:15:10, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >>>> >>>>>Look, man. Could you tell me if Blass contributed to a positive thing in this >>>>>thread? Maybe, you should also stick a cork and read the "positive things" that >>>>>Uri Blass wrote here too. I dont know what you read but the Uri BlassĀ“s messages >>>>>are never positive or doing compliments to somebody. >>>>> >>>>>Maybe, you are refering to another person? >>>> >>>>This is not about what Uri contributed with, this is about your rotten attitude. >>>> >>>>Most people on this board would tear your head off if you spoke to them in that >>>>tone, just because Uri is too good for that doesn't give you the right to walk >>>>all over him. >>>> >>> >>>No, wrong. He contributed a lot to boil all the spirits here. His asseverations >>>are far of being nice and in good shape. Too good for who? To insult or >>>underestimate poeple like the young Mridul? >>> >>> >>>>If you can't stop these personal attacks maybe it's time for you to have a >>>>little chat with the moderators. >>>> >>> >>>Yes, right. It is the time that Uri Blass stops of judgement with nonsense and >>>declaring things imprudently. >>> >>>-AO. >> >>Arturo, >> >>I found Uri's statement here very logical and critical. And very constructive. > >Not at all. > Vincent, i deny any objective of you in this case. I found Uri's statemants constructive in most cases and not arrogant. Asking questions rather than claiming the "absolute" truth. >>If there is a contradiction in your posting, you can be sure, Uri points it out. >>Uri's way to scrutinize things make you think deeper about the topic, you try to >>reexplain and profit yourself from this interaction. >>So i have problems to unterstand your problems with Uri. > >No. > >Uri is always rephrasing things and reasking which is in accordance with the >dutch saying that a fool can ask more than 100 wise men can answer. That implies that you are a "wise" man. Sorry, with all respect to your knowledege, i doubt it ;-) > >Further the big nonsense of uri in this thread has caused the original start of >the thread to dissappear. The original start of this thread was Christophe >accusing Mridul Muralidharan of not having written an engine, and i hope he has >apologized to Mridul for that. > >>Gerd > The original thread was about detecting threats in null move. Some harsh words yields to hurted vanity. Uri already stated, that he has no problem with Mridul at all. >Best regards, >Vincent Regards, Gerd
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.