Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 07:49:36 10/06/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 06, 2003 at 10:20:54, Torstein Hall wrote: >On October 06, 2003 at 07:24:44, ludicrous wrote: > >>But isn't it that 3000 is perfect chess already?...and having a rating like 2900 >>is APPROXIMATING or getting near perfection? Why should ratings exceed 3000? > >10-20 years ago a world class top 10 player used to be on 2500++. Today they are >at 2700++ There seems to be inflation in the ELO system. I do not now the reason >for that. The numbers have no meaning except for differences. There is an interesting ELO classification site here: http://www.chessmetrics.com/index.html Take a look at this graph: http://www.chessmetrics.com/FE/Graphs150.htm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.