Author: Dana Turnmire
Date: 09:35:45 10/06/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 06, 2003 at 00:34:57, K. Burcham wrote: >On October 06, 2003 at 00:09:57, G.M. Yates wrote: > >>For Humans Only! >> >>Mates are usually too easy for computers! >> >>r4r2/2p2pk1/b1n1pN2/p1p1P1B1/2p5/5R2/PPB3PP/RN4K1 w >> >> >> >>Morphy,P - Carr >>Blindfold Game, 1858 > >no humans at this site. I think some humans read here, but not very often does a >human actually post here. those that post here are mostly programmers, >chipheads, chess gamers, code geeks, overclockers, and software freaks. > >so mate positions that are challenging for GM but are very simple for chess >programs will not get much interest here. I tried your position with BamBam, >List, and Doctor 3.0, all could see mate in 0 time. > >kburcham I like the mate in one challenges.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.