Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Can Bob fix this?

Author: Vincent Lejeune

Date: 14:00:22 10/06/03

Go up one level in this thread


On October 06, 2003 at 14:19:44, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On October 06, 2003 at 13:59:30, Slater Wold wrote:
>
>>On October 06, 2003 at 13:56:33, Dann Corbit wrote:
>>
>>>On October 06, 2003 at 13:51:29, Slater Wold wrote:
>>>
>>>>[D]8/6NK/8/1Bk5/P5q1/8/8/8 w - - 0 107
>>>>
>>>>A lot of engines, after a lot of time can see this is lost.
>>>>
>>>>Crafty cannot.
>>>>
>>>>Any ideas on how to fix this?  Other than waiting for Eugene to make the TB?  :)
>>>
>>>Are you sure that it is lost?
>>>
>>>What is the sequence of moves that wins for black?
>>
>>Positive.  Here's one engine's "proof":
>>
>>Nouvelle partie
>>8/6NK/8/1Bk5/P5q1/8/8/8 w - - 0 1
>>
>>Analysis by Hiarcs 9:
>>
>>1.Rg8
>>  -+  (-3.09)   Profondeur: 1/6   00:00:00
>>1.Rg8 Rb6
>>  -+  (-3.30)   Profondeur: 2/7   00:00:00
>>1.Rg8 Rb6
>>  -+  (-3.05)   Profondeur: 3/10   00:00:00
>>1.Rg8 Dg6
>>  -+  (-2.97)   Profondeur: 3/10   00:00:00
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Rf8 Df6+ 3.Rg8
>>  -+  (-3.07)   Profondeur: 4/11   00:00:00
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.a5
>>  -+  (-3.00)   Profondeur: 5/13   00:00:00  4kN, tb=9
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Rf8 Df6+ 3.Rg8 Rb6 4.Ce8 De6+ 5.Rf8
>>  -+  (-3.19)   Profondeur: 6/14   00:00:00  8kN, tb=24
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Ch5 De7 4.Fg6 Dd8+
>>  -+  (-3.13)   Profondeur: 7/15   00:00:00  20kN, tb=54
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Fb5 Rb6 4.Ce8 De7
>>  -+  (-3.36)   Profondeur: 8/17   00:00:00  34kN, tb=104
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Ch5 De7 4.Fb5 Rb6
>>  -+  (-3.37)   Profondeur: 9/19   00:00:00  83kN, tb=282
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Ch5 De7 4.Cg7 Rb6 5.Fb5 Ra5
>>  -+  (-3.37)   Profondeur: 10/21   00:00:00  145kN, tb=591
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Fb5 Rb6
>>  -+  (-3.37)   Profondeur: 11/25   00:00:01  472kN, tb=1756
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Fd7 Rb6 4.Ce8 Dd8 5.Fb5 De7
>>  -+  (-3.40)   Profondeur: 12/25   00:00:02  724kN, tb=2949
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Fd7 Rb6 4.Ce8 De7 5.Fb5 Ra5 6.Cg7 Df6 7.Ce8 Df5
>>  -+  (-3.41)   Profondeur: 13/27   00:00:04  1215kN, tb=5019
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Fd7 Rb6 4.Ce8 De7 5.Fb5 Ra5 6.Cg7 Df6 7.Ce8 Df5
>>  -+  (-3.41)   Profondeur: 14/30   00:00:09  2434kN, tb=11428
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Fb5 Rb6 4.Ce8
>>  -+  (-3.41)   Profondeur: 15/35   00:00:51  15968kN, tb=52954
>>1.Rg8 Df3 2.Rh7 Df7 3.Fe8 Df6 4.Fd7 Rb6 5.Rg8 Df3
>>  -+  (-3.44)   Profondeur: 16/39   00:01:17  24555kN, tb=85389
>>1.Rg8 Rd6 2.Rf7 Df3+ 3.Rg6 Re5 4.Ch5 Df5+ 5.Rh6 Rd6 6.Fa6 De6+ 7.Rg5 Dd5+ 8.Rh4
>>De4+
>>  -+  (-3.63)   Profondeur: 17/46   00:02:29  51322kN, tb=183873
>>1.Rg8 Rd6 2.Rf7 Df3+ 3.Rg6 Re5 4.Ch5 Df5+ 5.Rh6 Rd6 6.Fa6 De6+ 7.Rg5 Dd5+ 8.Rh4
>>De4+
>>  -+  (-3.88)   Profondeur: 18/49   00:02:47  57330kN, tb=207961
>>1.Rg8 Rd6
>>  -+  (-#58)   Profondeur: 18/49   00:02:48  57527kN, tb=208339
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Fb5 Rd4 4.Ce8 De7 5.Cg7 Re5 6.Fe8 Db7 7.Fb5 Rf6
>>  -+  (-#31)   Profondeur: 18/49   00:10:16  287814kN, tb=1226066
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Fb5 Rd4 4.Ce8 Df4
>>  -+  (-#31)   Profondeur: 19/49   00:11:26  327024kN, tb=1373757
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Fb5 Rd4 4.Ce8 Df4
>>  -+  (-#31)   Profondeur: 20/49   00:11:29  328682kN, tb=1380484
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Fb5 Rd4 4.Ce8 Df4
>>  -+  (-#31)   Profondeur: 21/49   00:11:41  335618kN, tb=1404576
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Fb5 Rd4 4.Ce8 Df4
>>  -+  (-#31)   Profondeur: 22/52   00:11:54  344638kN, tb=1433107
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Fb5 Rd4 4.Ce8 Df4
>>  -+  (-#31)   Profondeur: 23/53   00:12:22  362350kN, tb=1488420
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Fb5 Rd4 4.Ce8 Df4
>>  -+  (-#31)   Profondeur: 24/56   00:13:16  392969kN, tb=1592392
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Fb5 Rd4 4.Ce8 Df4
>>  -+  (-#31)   Profondeur: 25/57   00:14:38  437519kN, tb=1740029
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Fb5 Rd4 4.Ce8 Df4
>>  -+  (-#31)   Profondeur: 26/61   00:17:54  543503kN, tb=2069166
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Fb5 Rd4 4.Ce8 Df4
>>  -+  (-#31)   Profondeur: 27/62   00:26:04  791397kN, tb=2781311
>>
>>(, - 05.10.2003)
>
>
>
>I go to the end of your line and get nothing but draw scores.
>
>               14->   1.04  -0.01   5. Bd7 Qg5+ 6. Kf8 Qd5 7. Ke7 Qxd7+
>                                    <EGTB> (s=2)
>               15     1.79  -0.01   5. Bd7 Qg5+ 6. Kf8 Qd5 7. Ke7 Qxd7+
>                                    <EGTB>
>               15->   2.88  -0.01   5. Bd7 Qg5+ 6. Kf8 Qd5 7. Ke7 Qxd7+
>                                    <EGTB> (s=2)
>               16    14.55  -0.01   5. Bd7 Qg5+ 6. Kf8 Qd5 7. Ke7 Qxd7+
>                                    <EGTB>
>               16->  18.23  -0.01   5. Bd7 Qg5+ 6. Kf8 Qd5 7. Ke7 Qxd7+
>                                    <EGTB>
>               17     1:54  -0.01   5. Bd7 Qg5+ 6. Kf8 Kc3 7. Bb5 Qc5+
>                                    8. Kg8 Kb4 9. Kh8 Qxb5 <EGTB>
>               17->   2:11  -0.01   5. Bd7 Qg5+ 6. Kf8 Kc3 7. Bb5 Qc5+
>                                    8. Kg8 Kb4 9. Kh8 Qxb5 <EGTB>
>
>Note that your piece names are hard for us SAN folks to read.  IE I know
>a Queen is a "D", but I thought a knight was a "S" and a bishop was a
>"L"??
>
>Crafty reports draw scores all the way through starting at the initial
>position.  I therefore have no idea what is wrong unless it is a simple
>matter of not extending in the right place to see some subtle threat.

after 5.Bd7, here are the 5 best lines from hiarcs 9 in PGN format :

[Event "?"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "????.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Nouvelle partie"]
[Black "?"]
[Result "*"]
[SetUp "1"]
[FEN "8/6NK/8/1Bk5/P5q1/8/8/8 w - - 0 1"]
[PlyCount "18"]

1. Kg8 Qg6 2. Be8 Qf6 3. Bb5 Kd4 4. Ne8 Qf4 5. Bd7 Ke5 {Hiarcs 9: 1)} 6. Kg7 ({
Hiarcs 9: 2)} 6. Ng7 Qd4 7. Be8 Kf6 8. Nh5+ Ke7 {[%eval -32744,8]}) ({
Hiarcs 9: 3)} 6. Bb5 Ke6 7. Ng7+ Ke7 8. Kh7 Qf6 {[%eval -32744,8]}) ({
Hiarcs 9: 4)} 6. a5 Qd4 7. Bh3 Qd3 {[%eval -32753,8]}) ({Hiarcs 9: 5)} 6. Bc8
Qxa4 {[%eval -32756,8]}) 6... Qd4 7. Bb5 Ke6+ 8. Kh6 Qh4+ 9. Kg6 Qg4+ {
[%eval -32738,8]} *




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.