Author: Vincent Lejeune
Date: 14:14:15 10/06/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 06, 2003 at 14:30:20, Dann Corbit wrote:
>On October 06, 2003 at 13:59:30, Slater Wold wrote:
>
>>On October 06, 2003 at 13:56:33, Dann Corbit wrote:
>>
>>>On October 06, 2003 at 13:51:29, Slater Wold wrote:
>>>
>>>>[D]8/6NK/8/1Bk5/P5q1/8/8/8 w - - 0 107
>>>>
>>>>A lot of engines, after a lot of time can see this is lost.
>>>>
>>>>Crafty cannot.
>>>>
>>>>Any ideas on how to fix this? Other than waiting for Eugene to make the TB? :)
>>>
>>>Are you sure that it is lost?
>>>
>>>What is the sequence of moves that wins for black?
>>
>>Positive. Here's one engine's "proof":
>>
>>Nouvelle partie
>>8/6NK/8/1Bk5/P5q1/8/8/8 w - - 0 1
>>
>>Analysis by Hiarcs 9:
>>
>>1.Rg8
>> -+ (-3.09) Profondeur: 1/6 00:00:00
>>1.Rg8 Rb6
>> -+ (-3.30) Profondeur: 2/7 00:00:00
>>1.Rg8 Rb6
>> -+ (-3.05) Profondeur: 3/10 00:00:00
>>1.Rg8 Dg6
>> -+ (-2.97) Profondeur: 3/10 00:00:00
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Rf8 Df6+ 3.Rg8
>> -+ (-3.07) Profondeur: 4/11 00:00:00
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.a5
>> -+ (-3.00) Profondeur: 5/13 00:00:00 4kN, tb=9
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Rf8 Df6+ 3.Rg8 Rb6 4.Ce8 De6+ 5.Rf8
>> -+ (-3.19) Profondeur: 6/14 00:00:00 8kN, tb=24
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Ch5 De7 4.Fg6 Dd8+
>> -+ (-3.13) Profondeur: 7/15 00:00:00 20kN, tb=54
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Fb5 Rb6 4.Ce8 De7
>> -+ (-3.36) Profondeur: 8/17 00:00:00 34kN, tb=104
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Ch5 De7 4.Fb5 Rb6
>> -+ (-3.37) Profondeur: 9/19 00:00:00 83kN, tb=282
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Ch5 De7 4.Cg7 Rb6 5.Fb5 Ra5
>> -+ (-3.37) Profondeur: 10/21 00:00:00 145kN, tb=591
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Fb5 Rb6
>> -+ (-3.37) Profondeur: 11/25 00:00:01 472kN, tb=1756
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Fd7 Rb6 4.Ce8 Dd8 5.Fb5 De7
>> -+ (-3.40) Profondeur: 12/25 00:00:02 724kN, tb=2949
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Fd7 Rb6 4.Ce8 De7 5.Fb5 Ra5 6.Cg7 Df6 7.Ce8 Df5
>> -+ (-3.41) Profondeur: 13/27 00:00:04 1215kN, tb=5019
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Fd7 Rb6 4.Ce8 De7 5.Fb5 Ra5 6.Cg7 Df6 7.Ce8 Df5
>> -+ (-3.41) Profondeur: 14/30 00:00:09 2434kN, tb=11428
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Fb5 Rb6 4.Ce8
>> -+ (-3.41) Profondeur: 15/35 00:00:51 15968kN, tb=52954
>>1.Rg8 Df3 2.Rh7 Df7 3.Fe8 Df6 4.Fd7 Rb6 5.Rg8 Df3
>> -+ (-3.44) Profondeur: 16/39 00:01:17 24555kN, tb=85389
>>1.Rg8 Rd6 2.Rf7 Df3+ 3.Rg6 Re5 4.Ch5 Df5+ 5.Rh6 Rd6 6.Fa6 De6+ 7.Rg5 Dd5+ 8.Rh4
>>De4+
>> -+ (-3.63) Profondeur: 17/46 00:02:29 51322kN, tb=183873
>>1.Rg8 Rd6 2.Rf7 Df3+ 3.Rg6 Re5 4.Ch5 Df5+ 5.Rh6 Rd6 6.Fa6 De6+ 7.Rg5 Dd5+ 8.Rh4
>>De4+
>> -+ (-3.88) Profondeur: 18/49 00:02:47 57330kN, tb=207961
>>1.Rg8 Rd6
>> -+ (-#58) Profondeur: 18/49 00:02:48 57527kN, tb=208339
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Fb5 Rd4 4.Ce8 De7 5.Cg7 Re5 6.Fe8 Db7 7.Fb5 Rf6
>> -+ (-#31) Profondeur: 18/49 00:10:16 287814kN, tb=1226066
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Fb5 Rd4 4.Ce8 Df4
>> -+ (-#31) Profondeur: 19/49 00:11:26 327024kN, tb=1373757
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Fb5 Rd4 4.Ce8 Df4
>> -+ (-#31) Profondeur: 20/49 00:11:29 328682kN, tb=1380484
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Fb5 Rd4 4.Ce8 Df4
>> -+ (-#31) Profondeur: 21/49 00:11:41 335618kN, tb=1404576
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Fb5 Rd4 4.Ce8 Df4
>> -+ (-#31) Profondeur: 22/52 00:11:54 344638kN, tb=1433107
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Fb5 Rd4 4.Ce8 Df4
>> -+ (-#31) Profondeur: 23/53 00:12:22 362350kN, tb=1488420
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Fb5 Rd4 4.Ce8 Df4
>> -+ (-#31) Profondeur: 24/56 00:13:16 392969kN, tb=1592392
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Fb5 Rd4 4.Ce8 Df4
>> -+ (-#31) Profondeur: 25/57 00:14:38 437519kN, tb=1740029
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Fb5 Rd4 4.Ce8 Df4
>> -+ (-#31) Profondeur: 26/61 00:17:54 543503kN, tb=2069166
>>1.Rg8 Dg6 2.Fe8 Df6 3.Fb5 Rd4 4.Ce8 Df4
>> -+ (-#31) Profondeur: 27/62 00:26:04 791397kN, tb=2781311
>>
>>(, - 05.10.2003)
>
>This indicates that Rg8 loses.
>How about Kh6?
Here are the 6 best lines from H9:
[Event "?"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "????.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Nouvelle partie"]
[Black "?"]
[Result "*"]
[SetUp "1"]
[FEN "8/6NK/8/1Bk5/P5q1/8/8/8 w - - 0 1"]
[PlyCount "11"]
{Hiarcs 9: 1)} 1. Kg8 ({Hiarcs 9: 2)} 1. Kh6 Kd6 2. Nh5 Qf5 3. Ba6 Qe6+ 4. Kg5
Qe3+ 5. Kf5 Qe5+ 6. Kg6 Qe4+ 7. Kg5 Qxa4 {[%eval -32735,14]}) ({Hiarcs 9: 3)}
1. Ne8 Qg5 2. Ng7 Kd6 3. Be8 Qf4 {[%eval -32740,14]}) ({Hiarcs 9: 4)} 1. Be8
Kd6 2. Bb5 Ke7 3. Kh6 Qf4+ 4. Kh5 Qe5+ 5. Kh6 {[%eval -32741,13]}) ({
Hiarcs 9: 5)} 1. Kh8 Kd6 2. Kh7 Ke7 3. Kh6 Qf4+ 4. Kh5 Qe5+ 5. Kh6 {
[%eval -32741,13]}) 1... Kd6 2. Kf7 Qf4+ 3. Kg6 Ke5 4. Ne8 Qf5+ 5. Kh6 Qg4 6.
Ng7 {[%eval -32730,16]} *
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.