Author: Peter Berger
Date: 03:15:42 10/07/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 06, 2003 at 12:24:32, Dann Corbit wrote: >On October 06, 2003 at 11:45:35, Robert Allgeuer wrote: > >>On October 06, 2003 at 10:39:27, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>Interesting, are there any reasons why rebel12 is stronger than rebel12_cb in a >>statistically significant way? >> 2 Rebel12 : 2828 39 48 200 65.2 % 2719 25.5 % >> 6 Rebel12_Cb : 2654 61 68 99 60.1 % 2583 19.2 % > >2828 - 48 = 2780 >2654 + 61 = 2715 > >So it seems that Rebel12 is stronger than the one called Rebel12_CB. >The Rebel12 games are with the prerelease version and played mostly under >Winboard. >The Rebel12_CB games are with the released version and played under Arena. >But I do not know why we should see a statisically significant difference. Ed Schroeder posted some time ago that Rebel got only 25% of CPU power playing under Arena when installed as a WB engine - this sounds like a good explanation for the strength difference. You could try to install it with WB2Uci or play with WinBoard or CP itself of course. Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.