Author: Günther Simon
Date: 05:05:53 10/07/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 07, 2003 at 06:15:42, Peter Berger wrote: >On October 06, 2003 at 12:24:32, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On October 06, 2003 at 11:45:35, Robert Allgeuer wrote: >> >>>On October 06, 2003 at 10:39:27, Dann Corbit wrote: >>> >>>Interesting, are there any reasons why rebel12 is stronger than rebel12_cb in a >>>statistically significant way? >>> 2 Rebel12 : 2828 39 48 200 65.2 % 2719 25.5 % >>> 6 Rebel12_Cb : 2654 61 68 99 60.1 % 2583 19.2 % >> >>2828 - 48 = 2780 >>2654 + 61 = 2715 >> >>So it seems that Rebel12 is stronger than the one called Rebel12_CB. >>The Rebel12 games are with the prerelease version and played mostly under >>Winboard. >>The Rebel12_CB games are with the released version and played under Arena. >>But I do not know why we should see a statisically significant difference. > >Ed Schroeder posted some time ago that Rebel got only 25% of CPU power playing >under Arena when installed as a WB engine - this sounds like a good explanation >for the strength difference. > >You could try to install it with WB2Uci or play with WinBoard or CP itself of >course. > >Peter Hi Peter, I dont think that Dann had played those games under Arena, at least it would make me wonder, as I know that he almost ever would prefer Winboard to most other GUIs. But well, its of course up to him to clarify this :) Regards, Günther
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.