Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 20:03:00 10/07/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 07, 2003 at 22:34:09, Dann Corbit wrote:
>On October 07, 2003 at 21:37:50, Telmo Escobar wrote:
>
>>On October 07, 2003 at 18:48:30, Slater Wold wrote:
>>
>>>[D]r2br1k1/1b1n2p1/p2pp1Pp/qp6/3BPP2/P1N5/1PPQ4/1K1R1B1R w - -
>>>
>>>This game can be over in ~10 moves.
>>>
>>>Can you find Bxg7?
>>
>> I'd firstly examine 1.Bxg7 Kxg7 2.Rxh6 Kxh6 3.Qh2+ Kxg6 4.Bxb5- but I'm fond of
>>"brilliant" blunders.
>
>Blacks 4 .. Bg5 reply still loses. Or are you thinking of something else?
1.Bxg7 Kxg7 2.Rxh6 Kxh6 3.Qh2+ Kxg6 4.Bxb5 Bg5 5. Bxd7 Rh8 6. Qg2
leads to this:
time surplus 0.00 time limit 16:39 (16:39)
depth time score variation (1)
6 0.40 1.21 1. ... Raf8 2. Bxe6 Kf6 3. e5+ dxe5
4. fxg5+ Kxe6 5. Qxb7
6 0.62 0.96 1. ... Qc5 2. Bxe6 Kf6 3. Bd5 Bxf4
4. Bxb7
6 0.88 0.68 1. ... Rad8 2. Bxe6 Kf6 3. Bd5 Bxf4
4. Bxb7 Rb8
6-> 1.27 0.68 1. ... Rad8 2. Bxe6 Kf6 3. Bd5 Bxf4
4. Bxb7 Rb8
7 1.34 -- 1. ... Rad8
7 1.73 1.46 1. ... Rad8 2. Bxe6 Kf6 3. Bd5 Bxf4
4. Rf1 Rb8 5. Rxf4+ Ke7
7 2.20 1.12 1. ... Qc5 2. Bxe6 Kf6 3. Bd5 Bxf4
4. e5+ Kf5 5. Bxb7
7 3.10 0.60 1. ... Kf7 2. Qg4 Be7 3. Qxe6+ Kf8
4. Rxd6 Rh1+ 5. Nd1 Bxd6 6. Qxd6+
7-> 3.28 0.60 1. ... Kf7 2. Qg4 Be7 3. Qxe6+ Kf8
4. Rxd6 Rh1+ 5. Nd1 Bxd6 6. Qxd6+
8 3.52 -- 1. ... Kf7
8 4.73 1.70 1. ... Kf7 2. Qg4 Rh4 3. Qxe6+ Kg7
4. fxg5 Qe5 5. Rxd6 Qxe6 6. Rxe6
8 6.12 1.02 1. ... Qc5 2. Rg1 Kf7 3. Qg4 Qc4 4.
fxg5 Ke7 5. Ba4
8-> 7.59 1.02 1. ... Qc5 2. Rg1 Kf7 3. Qg4 Qc4 4.
fxg5 Ke7 5. Ba4
9 8.25 -- 1. ... Qc5
9 10.68 2.04 1. ... Qc5 2. Bxe6 Rh5 3. Rf1 Kg7 4.
fxg5 Rxg5 5. Rf7+ Kg6 6. Qf3
9 12.03 1.85 1. ... Kf7 2. Qg4 Rh4 3. Qxe6+ Kg7
4. Rg1 Rxf4 5. Nd5 Bxd5 6. Rxg5+ Kh7
7. exd5
9 15.15 1.39 1. ... Raf8 2. Bxe6 Rxf4 3. Bf5+ Kf7
4. Qxg5 Qe5 5. Nd5 Bxd5 6. Qg6+ Ke7
7. Rxd5
9-> 15.91 1.39 1. ... Raf8 2. Bxe6 Rxf4 3. Bf5+ Kf7
4. Qxg5 Qe5 5. Nd5 Bxd5 6. Qg6+ Ke7
7. Rxd5
10 16.36 1.47 1. ... Raf8 2. Bxe6 Rxf4 3. Bf5+ Kf7
4. Qxg5 Qe5 5. Qg6+ Ke7 6. Nd5+ Bxd5
7. Rxd5 Rf1+ 8. Ka2 Qf4
10-> 19.69 1.47 1. ... Raf8 2. Bxe6 Rxf4 3. Bf5+ Kf7
4. Qxg5 Qe5 5. Qg6+ Ke7 6. Nd5+ Bxd5
7. Rxd5 Rf1+ 8. Ka2 Qf4
11 20.34 1.53 1. ... Raf8 2. Bxe6 Rxf4 3. Bf5+ Kf7
4. Qxg5 Qe5 5. Nd5 Bxd5 6. Rxd5 Rf1+
7. Ka2 Qf4 8. Qg2
11 23.19 1.32 1. ... Kf7 2. Qg4 Rh4 3. Qxe6+ Kg7
4. fxg5 Qe5 5. Qc4 Bxe4 6. Qe2 Kg6
7. Re1
11-> 24.24 1.32 1. ... Kf7 2. Qg4 Rh4 3. Qxe6+ Kg7
4. fxg5 Qe5 5. Qc4 Bxe4 6. Qe2 Kg6
7. Re1
12 26.43 -- 1. ... Kf7
12 1:50 2.38 1. ... Kf7 2. Qg4 Kg7 3. fxg5 Bc8 4.
Rxd6 Rd8 5. Qxe6 Qxg5 6. Rd5 Qg1+ 7.
Rd1 Qc5
12 1:59 1.60 1. ... Raf8 2. Bxe6 Rxf4 3. Bf5+ Kf7
4. Qxg5 Qe5 5. Qg6+ Ke7 6. Qg1 Kf7
7. Qb6 Bc8 8. Bxc8 Rxc8 9. Rxd6
12-> 2:07 1.60 1. ... Raf8 2. Bxe6 Rxf4 3. Bf5+ Kf7
4. Qxg5 Qe5 5. Qg6+ Ke7 6. Qg1 Kf7
7. Qb6 Bc8 8. Bxc8 Rxc8 9. Rxd6
13 2:10 1.99 1. ... Raf8 2. Bxe6 Rxf4 3. Bf5+ Kf7
4. Qxg5 Qe5 5. Qg6+ Ke7 6. Nd5+ Bxd5
<HT>
13 2:39 1.96 1. ... Qd8 2. Rxd6 Kg7 3. fxg5 Qe7
4. Qd2 Rad8 5. e5 Rhf8 6. Ka2 Kg6 7.
Ne2 Qxg5 8. Rxe6+
13-> 2:45 1.96 1. ... Qd8 2. Rxd6 Kg7 3. fxg5 Qe7
4. Qd2 Rad8 5. e5 Rhf8 6. Ka2 Kg6 7.
Ne2 Qxg5 8. Rxe6+
14 3:37 -- 1. ... Qd8
14 5:04 2.62 1. ... Qd8 2. Bxe6 Kg7 3. fxg5 Qe7
4. Qg4 Rab8 5. Rf1 Bc8 6. Bf5 Qb7 7.
b3 Bxf5 8. exf5 Rh2
14 8:06 2.05 1. ... Rh5 2. Bxe6 Kg7 3. Rxd6 Rd8
4. Rxd8 Qxd8 5. fxg5 Rxg5 6. Qh3 Bc6
7. Qf1 Qf6 8. Qh3 Kf8
14 8:31 1.64 1. ... Raf8 2. Bxe6 Rxf4 3. Bf5+ Kf7
4. Qxg5 Qe5 5. Qg6+ Ke7 6. Qg1 Kf7
7. Qb6 Qe7 8. Rxd6 Rh1+ 9. Ka2 Kg8
14-> 9:19 1.64 1. ... Raf8 2. Bxe6 Rxf4 3. Bf5+ Kf7
4. Qxg5 Qe5 5. Qg6+ Ke7 6. Qg1 Kf7
7. Qb6 Qe7 8. Rxd6 Rh1+ 9. Ka2 Kg8
15 9:19 1/44* 1. ... Raf8
So I am not so sure of the win any more (1.6 pawns is not terribly decisive).
I will analyze this one overnight.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.