Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 18:50:42 10/09/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 09, 2003 at 02:16:37, Dana Turnmire wrote:
>Thanks for the explanation though I'm not sure who the original poster was of
>this. It just didn't make sense that an evaluation function that was supposedly
>inherently defective could propel Richard Langs programs to ten world titles.
>Regards.
There is nothing defective in this evaluation asymetry.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.