Author: José Carlos
Date: 02:09:13 10/11/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 11, 2003 at 05:02:59, Alessandro Damiani wrote: >On October 11, 2003 at 04:30:36, José Carlos wrote: > >>On October 11, 2003 at 01:37:19, Christophe Theron wrote: >> >>>On October 10, 2003 at 13:11:42, José Carlos wrote: >>> >>>>On October 10, 2003 at 12:47:19, Christophe Theron wrote: >>>> >>>>>On October 10, 2003 at 12:37:56, José Carlos wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On October 10, 2003 at 12:10:27, Christophe Theron wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>What a shame... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Christophe >>>>>> >>>>>> You have the right to ignore any post you don't like. >>>>>> Personally, I couldn't care less about Bas hardware. I'm interested in the >>>>>>problem itself, the nodes and the PV's. >>>>>> So Bas, thanks for posting your analysis. >>>>>> >>>>>> José C. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>So you mean that mentionning the processor type and speed together with the >>>>>analysis is useless? >>>>> >>>>>Is it the opinion you want to defend? >>>> >>>> For me? Yes. Is that bad? >>>> >>>> José C. >>> >>> >>> >>>Then why mention the hash table size and not the processor type/speed? >>> >>>Why post the entire, long, boring analysis and not just the solution time and >>>score? >>> >>> >>> >>> Christophe >> >> Why post boring tounament talbes? Why post boring questions about how to run >>this or that program under this or that GUI? Why post boring commercial >>advertisments about a new version or a patch? Why post boring "how does alpha >>beta search work" questions? >> Your question and all my questions have the same answer: what I'm interested >>in is not necessarily what the rest of the world is. I respect posts I'm not >>interested in because I know someone is. >> >> José C. > > >The question is the value of a posting if one is interested in reading it. > >When I see a time indication in a result then I am interested in the hardware >used. If this information is not provided then the time indication is worthless. >Can you compare it? No. > >Alessandro 1. "Worthless for you" != "a shame" 2. You want to compare? Fine. Must then everyone else want to compare? Of course not. 3. If someone gives you for free something you don't need, will you say "it's a shame you gave me this thing I don't need"? Or would you rather say "thanks, could you please also give me that for the gift is more useful for me"? José C.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.