Author: Alessandro Damiani
Date: 02:19:23 10/11/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 11, 2003 at 05:09:13, José Carlos wrote: >On October 11, 2003 at 05:02:59, Alessandro Damiani wrote: > >>On October 11, 2003 at 04:30:36, José Carlos wrote: >> >>>On October 11, 2003 at 01:37:19, Christophe Theron wrote: >>> >>>>On October 10, 2003 at 13:11:42, José Carlos wrote: >>>> >>>>>On October 10, 2003 at 12:47:19, Christophe Theron wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On October 10, 2003 at 12:37:56, José Carlos wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On October 10, 2003 at 12:10:27, Christophe Theron wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>What a shame... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Christophe >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You have the right to ignore any post you don't like. >>>>>>> Personally, I couldn't care less about Bas hardware. I'm interested in the >>>>>>>problem itself, the nodes and the PV's. >>>>>>> So Bas, thanks for posting your analysis. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> José C. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>So you mean that mentionning the processor type and speed together with the >>>>>>analysis is useless? >>>>>> >>>>>>Is it the opinion you want to defend? >>>>> >>>>> For me? Yes. Is that bad? >>>>> >>>>> José C. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>Then why mention the hash table size and not the processor type/speed? >>>> >>>>Why post the entire, long, boring analysis and not just the solution time and >>>>score? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Christophe >>> >>> Why post boring tounament talbes? Why post boring questions about how to run >>>this or that program under this or that GUI? Why post boring commercial >>>advertisments about a new version or a patch? Why post boring "how does alpha >>>beta search work" questions? >>> Your question and all my questions have the same answer: what I'm interested >>>in is not necessarily what the rest of the world is. I respect posts I'm not >>>interested in because I know someone is. >>> >>> José C. >> >> >>The question is the value of a posting if one is interested in reading it. >> >>When I see a time indication in a result then I am interested in the hardware >>used. If this information is not provided then the time indication is worthless. >>Can you compare it? No. >> >>Alessandro > > 1. "Worthless for you" != "a shame" > 2. You want to compare? Fine. Must then everyone else want to compare? Of >course not. > 3. If someone gives you for free something you don't need, will you say "it's >a shame you gave me this thing I don't need"? Or would you rather say "thanks, >could you please also give me that for the gift is more useful for me"? > > José C. If I would give you my broken TV set, would you take it just because it is a gift? Alessandro
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.