Author: José Carlos
Date: 02:32:40 10/11/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 11, 2003 at 05:19:23, Alessandro Damiani wrote: >On October 11, 2003 at 05:09:13, José Carlos wrote: > >>On October 11, 2003 at 05:02:59, Alessandro Damiani wrote: >> >>>On October 11, 2003 at 04:30:36, José Carlos wrote: >>> >>>>On October 11, 2003 at 01:37:19, Christophe Theron wrote: >>>> >>>>>On October 10, 2003 at 13:11:42, José Carlos wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On October 10, 2003 at 12:47:19, Christophe Theron wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On October 10, 2003 at 12:37:56, José Carlos wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On October 10, 2003 at 12:10:27, Christophe Theron wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>What a shame... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Christophe >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You have the right to ignore any post you don't like. >>>>>>>> Personally, I couldn't care less about Bas hardware. I'm interested in the >>>>>>>>problem itself, the nodes and the PV's. >>>>>>>> So Bas, thanks for posting your analysis. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> José C. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>So you mean that mentionning the processor type and speed together with the >>>>>>>analysis is useless? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Is it the opinion you want to defend? >>>>>> >>>>>> For me? Yes. Is that bad? >>>>>> >>>>>> José C. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Then why mention the hash table size and not the processor type/speed? >>>>> >>>>>Why post the entire, long, boring analysis and not just the solution time and >>>>>score? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Christophe >>>> >>>> Why post boring tounament talbes? Why post boring questions about how to run >>>>this or that program under this or that GUI? Why post boring commercial >>>>advertisments about a new version or a patch? Why post boring "how does alpha >>>>beta search work" questions? >>>> Your question and all my questions have the same answer: what I'm interested >>>>in is not necessarily what the rest of the world is. I respect posts I'm not >>>>interested in because I know someone is. >>>> >>>> José C. >>> >>> >>>The question is the value of a posting if one is interested in reading it. >>> >>>When I see a time indication in a result then I am interested in the hardware >>>used. If this information is not provided then the time indication is worthless. >>>Can you compare it? No. >>> >>>Alessandro >> >> 1. "Worthless for you" != "a shame" >> 2. You want to compare? Fine. Must then everyone else want to compare? Of >>course not. >> 3. If someone gives you for free something you don't need, will you say "it's >>a shame you gave me this thing I don't need"? Or would you rather say "thanks, >>could you please also give me that for the gift is more useful for me"? >> >> José C. > >If I would give you my broken TV set, would you take it just because it is a >gift? > >Alessandro If you give it with good intention, I'd say "thanks Alessandro, could you please fix it before giving to me? ;) Bas' post wasn't intended to bother anyone, so it's a gift in good intention. José C.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.