Author: Djordje Vidanovic
Date: 10:21:38 10/13/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 13, 2003 at 12:54:15, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >I was going to ask a few obvious questions, such as the date of >the Diep version you were using, and the method you used to run >this test, but after reading some of your followups I see it won't >be needed - this is downright slander, and it should be downright >obvious too to anyone with a double-digit IQ. > >I've drawn my conclusions about you and I've drawn some more >related to the time at which this was posted. > >-- >GCP You probably meant libel (regardles of this virtual and ephemeral, but still published, form)...? However, the first thing that comes to mind is to ask you what is false and defamatory about my testing these two engines at blitz? Did I say something false: the book is as it is, the results are there, the pgn is provided... Believe me, it is nothing compared with what some people say about other people's engines: e.g. engine X is but a clone of engine Z, or even worse... without any proof whatsoever. In this particular case you've got the pgn, you've got the engine specifications, you've got the versions of the program, the time controls,the name of the tester -- I should hasten to add that both programs used 32MB of hash; thus you could try and reproduce the games as well. You are even welcome to it. Will you please clear up your interpretation of the term you used to describe my post? The term is "slander". Djordje
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.