Author: Gerd Isenberg
Date: 11:39:15 10/13/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 12, 2003 at 06:32:25, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >Recently I conducted some extensive experiments with two versions of Falcon, one >with checks in quiescence and one without. Falcon already has lots of >extensions, but adding checks in quiescence resulted in a significant boost for >tactical strength. > >I tested the following options: > >a) checks everywhere in quiescence >b) checks only in the first ply of quiescence >c) no checks in quiescence > Some triggers in the current path (checks and other foreced moves), some heuristics and you may decide whether using a,b or c at runtime. Gerd <snip>
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.