Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Diep as a strong sparring opponent (longish)?

Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto

Date: 11:53:24 10/13/03

Go up one level in this thread

On October 13, 2003 at 14:47:32, Christophe Theron wrote:

>In the real world, a change that improves the strength at blitz also improves >at long time controls.

Not necessarily.

>And a change that gives good results at long time controls
>has good chances to also give an advantage at blitz.

Not necessarily.

>That's why very unbalanced engines are very uncommon. If the developpement of
>the engine has followed even a semi-scientific approach, and even if the author
>intended to improve it only for long time controls, this engine will also
>perform well at blitz.

No.

--
GCP

• Re: Diep as a strong sparring opponent (longish)? Christophe Theron 01:06:50 10/14/03
  • Re: Diep as a strong sparring opponent (longish)? Gian-Carlo Pascutto 04:18:18 10/14/03
    • Re: Diep as a strong sparring opponent (longish)? Christophe Theron 15:23:45 10/14/03
      • Re: Diep as a strong sparring opponent (longish)? Russell Reagan 19:57:50 10/14/03
        • Re: Diep as a strong sparring opponent (longish)? Christophe Theron 11:26:48 10/15/03

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.