Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: To check or not to check, this is the quiescence question

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 11:59:43 10/13/03

Go up one level in this thread


On October 13, 2003 at 12:03:32, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:

>On October 13, 2003 at 11:31:11, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On October 13, 2003 at 09:29:47, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>there are very big differences.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>There isn't a big difference if you are only talking about the q-search.
>>
>>If you do a check, you have to get out and that extends.  If you extend
>>on the check you don't extend when you get out and that extends.
>>
>>It is different in the normal part of the search, because if you extend on
>>a check you increase depth by one now.  You might reach the q-search if you
>>wait to extend when you escape check.  but in the q-search I don't see how it
>>is a "big difference".
>
>You don't have to apologize for not knowing basic tree math, you're excused.
>Had seen already in crafty code that it was done wrong there.
>
>Yet i had already posted years ago at CCC that if you extend when being checked,
>that this is better than when giving the check.
>
>What delivers more cutoffs for the hashtable:
>
>A)
>Re5+ (5 ply remaining)
>Kf7  (5 ply remaining)
>Rxa5 (4 ply remaining)
>

Doesn't matter.  If you do the same thing both ways, the results are
consistent.

Of course, if you do things inconsistently, then you get wrong answers.
I simply try to avoid that.  But again, you didn't _read_ what I wrote.

I _specifically_ said "in the q-search".  You didn't read that part, did
you?  Of course you didn't.  But, to make the point, in the q-search you
_already_ have "zero plies remaining".  So replace all your 4/5 numbers
with 0 and then tell me that one is better than the other.

Then feel free to apologize for once again popping off without _any_ idea
of what you are popping off about, where you are popping off about it, or
even why you are popping off.



>B)
>Re5+ (5 ply remaining)
>Kf7  (4 ply remaining)
>Rxa5 (4 ply remaining)
>

What does
>If you can answer that question then you'll know the answer to the basic tree
>searching question.


The answer is above.  There is _no_ difference.  Because in the q-search
there is no "5 ply remaining".

Ever think or read before you write???


---------------------------quote on---------------------------------------
>>There isn't a big difference if you are only talking about the q-search.
---------------------------quote off--------------------------------------

_now_ as far as who knows more about "tree math" I'll take my own knowledge
_any_ day.  It isn't full of holes, bad assumptions, and misconceptions.  Not
to mention the total inability to read anything and understand it...




>
>Best regards,
>Vincent



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.