Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 14:34:28 10/13/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 13, 2003 at 15:49:17, Drexel,Michael wrote:
>On October 13, 2003 at 15:24:28, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>On October 13, 2003 at 14:40:04, Christophe Theron wrote:
>>
>>>On October 13, 2003 at 14:25:42, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:
>>>
>>>>On October 13, 2003 at 14:19:14, Christophe Theron wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>If engine A gets a beating at blitz, expect it to get the same beating if you
>>>>>repeat the match with long time controls.
>>>>
>>>>It does not apply for all combinations of engines, at the very least.
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>GCP
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Please mention the combinations of engines you are referring to.
>>>
>>>Oh, yes, Genius... OK, apart from Genius performing better at blitz (which is
>>>not an example of an engine performing better at long time controls), what else?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Christophe
>>
>> CS Tal II, Gandalf 4.32, The King 3.23 SKR and Hiarcs 9
>> belong in the same category.
>> Kurt
>
>I dont agree.
>AFAIK The King 3.23 and Hiarcs 9 are not much better at long time controls.
>
>Delfi like Genius seems to perform much better at blitz.
>
>Michael
Hi Michael
OK, Hiarcs 9 is not much better at long time controls.
On the other hand The King 3.23 SKR belongs to the
top three engines at longer time controls what cannot
be said for blitz games.
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.