Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 20:12:26 10/13/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 13, 2003 at 23:09:37, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: Apologies to Levy. I meant to say you should pay some 'organisation costs a 50000 euro' to get a recognized world championship match until the entire ICGA board finds out. >On October 12, 2003 at 03:59:53, Steven Edwards wrote: > >>On October 12, 2003 at 03:30:13, Rodney Topor wrote: >>>On October 11, 2003 at 13:21:03, GuyHaworth wrote: >> >>>>Given multiple processors on a chip, PCs with FPGA-assist etc., the >>>>micro/non-micro divide is becoming less meaningful. Common-platform tournaments >>>>seem attractive, but some engines suit a particular platform more than others. >>> >>>Unless... What about defining a microcomputer in terms of weight. A micro- >>>computer is a self-contained computer weighing less than, say, 6 ounces. >>>At present, that would lead to a contest between the best programs running >>>on Palm OS and PocketPC (and similar) handheld devices. Even if moves were >>>currently relayed by hand, this would be an interesting contest now, and a more >>>interesting contest in the future... >> >>Another idea is to classify the competitors by wattage. >> >>Mainframe entrants would also be charged for air conditioning power >>requirements. > >You know how it works. Just show some cash to Levy and you got your world title >without playing :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.