Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Diep as a strong sparring opponent (longish)?

Author: Gerd Isenberg

Date: 08:29:50 10/14/03

Go up one level in this thread


On October 14, 2003 at 03:46:40, Christophe Theron wrote:

>On October 13, 2003 at 14:56:57, Gerd Isenberg wrote:
>
>>On October 13, 2003 at 14:19:14, Christophe Theron wrote:
>>
>>>On October 13, 2003 at 13:09:03, Charles Roberson wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>  You make the statement that Diep is a positional engine and you chose it based
>>>>on that. So, why did you run G/5 matches? At G/5 tactics and search depth
>>>>is crucial.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>I would like to bring to your attention that tactics and search depth are
>>>crucial at any time controls in chess.
>>>
>>>Showing dimishing returns from increased search depth is so difficult that in
>>>practice there is little difference between blitz and long time controls.
>>>
>>>If engine A gets a beating at blitz, expect it to get the same beating if you
>>>repeat the match with long time controls.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    Christophe
>>
>>Christophe,
>>
>>couldn't it be, that engines have some odd/even sympathy/antipathy?
>>If the characteristic line of this property is to be out of phase between two
>>programs, i can imagine that one is a better blitzer but the other the better
>>medium time player.
>
>
>I did not say that it is impossible to build very unbalanced chess programs.
>

Yes, but the question is the degree of (un)balance. Is the
performance-searchdepth(time) characteristic graph a straight line or more or
less discontinuous around a dimmish line or curve?


>
>
>
>>And what about fast against slow with "more" or "better" knowledge. At blitz
>>time control the the linear speedup (fast/slow) may be more important. But due
>>to superior branching factor at sime time the "better" knowledge pays off and
>>the match tilts.
>
>
>* Superior branching factor can be achieved even with a high NPS.
>
>* fast/slow vs dumb/knowledged is an outdated conception. Fast does not mean
>dumb and slow does not mean knowledged. It is an overly simplistic view of the
>problem that should be definitely forgotten.
>
>
>
>    Christophe


I agree that the extremes became indistinct, but i believe
the issue is still valid to some degree, even in your league.

Cheers,
Gerd



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.