Author: Roy Eassa
Date: 10:02:25 10/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 14, 2003 at 06:19:17, Gerhard Sonnabend wrote: >Hi ! > >The second match is closed. >(I only post the short tables here) > >Could any chessprogram profit from longer/shorter levels ? > >At the moment i carry out an experiment to find out if there are chessengines >which profit from shorter or longer (time)levels more than other engines. >Played on a P4-1600 / 64MB HTs / 4-TBs / ponder=off >with the "Noomen" (A-H) (=160 games every match) under the ChessBase-Fritz7-GUI. > >Completed are: >Shredder 7.04 vs Junior 8.0.0.2 > Total (+ 1/2 -) > 5min/game 98.5-61.5 (87-23-50) > 10min/game 94.0-66.0 (76-36-48) > 30min/game 92.5-67.5 (70-45-45) >120min/game 89.5-70.5 (65-49-46) > >and: > >Shredder 7.0(CB) vs Fritz 8.0.0.5 > Total (+ 1/2 -) > 5min/game 63.0-97.0 (40-46-74) > 10min/game 68.0-92.0 (49-38-73) > 30min/game 72.5-87.5 (47-51-62) >120min/game 68.5-91.5 (43-51-66) > >The current matches is (after 120 games per Level): >Chess Tiger 15.0(CB) "Normal" vs Beta-WIN-Rebel 12 (style=Test12a) > Total (+ 1/2 -) > 5min/game 83.0-37.0 (68-30-22) > 10min/game 80.0-40.0 (63-34-23) > 30min/game 68.5-51.5 (48-41-31) >120min/game 65.5-54.5 (41-49-30) >(Played on a Cel. 1.8GHz / 128MB HTs / ...the rest look above) > >The details and the games can be found on: >www.pcschach.de > >Best G.S. I see that in each set, the same engine won no matter the time control. I also see that, of the 9 times the time control was increased, the margin of victory lessened 7 of those times. Good stuff, thanks!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.