Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 10:09:20 10/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 14, 2003 at 02:35:22, Tony Werten wrote: >On October 13, 2003 at 14:31:10, Andreas Guettinger wrote: > >>On October 13, 2003 at 12:54:15, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >> >>>I was going to ask a few obvious questions, such as the date of >>>the Diep version you were using, and the method you used to run >>>this test, but after reading some of your followups I see it won't >>>be needed - this is downright slander, and it should be downright >>>obvious too to anyone with a double-digit IQ. >>> >>>I've drawn my conclusions about you and I've drawn some more >>>related to the time at which this was posted. >>> >>>-- >>>GCP >> >>I completely agree. 1. Nh3? Ridiculous! > >Everyone can see that. Specially someone who makes books. The fact that he >didn't even mentioned this strange move and that he also forgot to mention that >he tested a 6 year old version of diep makes it all very clear. > >The post was only ment to hurt Diep / Vincent. > >Not a good way to make friends if you're about to show up at your first >tournement. > >This beheavior will not make the operator feel very welcome. > >Tony Vidanovic will have a problem showing up at any tournament with his previous Voyager experiment. > >> >>Even if something happend to the book I would never try to draw conclusions from >>such results, and not mention the strange behaviour. >> >>regards >>Andy
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.