Author: Peter Fendrich
Date: 06:41:57 10/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 14, 2003 at 20:07:37, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >On October 13, 2003 at 08:16:20, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>while preparing the opening book for Ruffian I decided to use a very good >>positional program for Ruffe's sparring partner. I decided on Diep due to its >>impressive positional play. Diep also has an interesting and unorthodox opening >>book with lots of lines that are worth analysing. No small wonder, the book's >>creator is a super strong Fide Master, the author of Diep: Vincent Diepeveen. > >1) How could you know that Diep has "an impressive positional play"? How did you >draw this conclusion? > >2) It is interesting to know what book you are refering to because the last >public Diep Version was in 1995-1996 and this Version was 1.5... As far as I can >remember, this version had a Dos Gui and I would like to know how you could >automate the match. > >3) If you did not use this old Diep Version and you are refering later to a >newer version here: http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?320878, >"That was the stock book that came with Diep, ver. 2.*..." > >How did you get this newer version, because it was one of the last Winboard Diep >Versions in 2001? Did you paid for a Diep License to get this version? Or you >were a Beta Tester for that time (2001), since I have been the Author of the >Diep Book for 2 years, I cannot remember that Diep has mentioned you as a Beta >Tester neither lately. So, I am still wondered how you can refer to a Diep 2.X >Version. > >I paid for my first Diep Winboard Version but I cannot remember that Vincent has >mentioned you as a Diep Formal User. > >4) If you have this book, I can only remember an old book of eccentric openings >in 2001 that I created for Vincent only for fun so how you got this book? > >5) If you concluded that the book was fulfull of irregular openings, why didnt >you request a better opening book to Vincent Diepeveen and now you post this >doubtful Match? > >6) A correction: I have been the Diep´s Book Creator for 2 years and Vincent >Diepeveen has payed all the attention to the Engine. Therefore, your last >information is wrong. You should verify better the sources of your informations. > >AO. Let me add one question: 7) Why on earth did you play this match with such weird conditions and why did you publish it? I'm curious of what information you aim for. /Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.