Author: Joachim Rang
Date: 11:37:23 10/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 15, 2003 at 14:15:54, Christophe Theron wrote: >On October 15, 2003 at 13:48:26, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>On October 15, 2003 at 13:36:27, Wayne Lowrance wrote: >> >>>Are you saying that rebel is the better at deep analysis ?, I have yet to see a >>>program compare to Fritz8 in playing head to head in deep analysis such as in CC >>>chess, but I do not own Rebel ! >> >>i do say that hiarcs, rebel and other programs do profit more from TIME than >>fast-searchers do. >> >>therefore the fast-searchers are stronger on FAST time controls such as game in >>5, or 3'. >> >>but the things change when you play 40/120 or 60/60. > > > >And yet again that aging misconception about "fast searchers". > >If the programs did not display their NPS, we would see very different >conclusions. > >People are influenced by the NPS display and draw conclusions mostly from that >number, not from the playing style/strength of the programs. > > > > Christophe which is especially funny, since Hiarcs 9 (a "Slow searcher") is very good at blitz and looses (only a bit) on longer tiem controls. regards Joachim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.