Author: stuart taylor
Date: 13:27:26 10/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 15, 2003 at 05:26:44, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 15, 2003 at 04:16:59, stuart taylor wrote: > >>On October 15, 2003 at 03:39:38, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On October 14, 2003 at 23:32:08, K. Burcham wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>28. white is up +2.41 >>>> black is up +5.81 >>>>29. white mate in 9 >>>> black is up +8.39 >>>>30. white is up +2.62 >>>> black is up +8.89 >>>>31. white is up 6.55 >>>> black resigns >>>> >>>> >>>>next move from this position is 28.Kg2 >>>> [D] 1r4k1/R4pp1/8/5Qp1/p7/1q1PP1P1/5P1P/1rR3K1 w - - >>> >>> >>>I do not believe that GM's played that move >>>I guess that there was simply a mistake in writing the game. >>> >>>It is not a bad idea to use common sense before posting. >>> >>>Even weak player will not play 28.Kg2 that is a simple losing of a rook so it >>>does not make sense to believe that GM's played it. >>> >>>Uri >> >>I believe that ANY human can not think for a momment, and can imagine that e.g. >>the rook is protected e.g. by the queen (because of optical illusion), or simply >>was thinking about something else and forgot about the rook being en prise. >>I'm not saying that it should be a common thing! > >If it was one blunder maybe but the sides continued to blunder so I am >practically sure that the moves were not played and it is more logical to guess >that the sides were in time trouble and forgot to write the moves or that the >people who copied the moves for got to copy. > >I play against significantly weaker players and I do not remember optical >illusion like that. > >The probability for it to happen to both players is too small to have reasonable >doubt about it so I am sure that the moves that were posted were not played in >the game. > >I remember only one case some years ago when the opponent left the queen in the >wrong square so I captured his queen(he tried to correct it and said that he did >not mean to put it on that square and I believe him but the rules say that if >you left the queen on e2 even for only 1/4 second it is your problem even in >case that you meant to put it at d2). > >That tournament was active chess(30 minutes per game) and I know that a player >with rating near 2000 does not leave his queen at distance of one from my rook >on purpose. >Unfortunately I have not enough time to win that game and that game was drawn >but without the queen I could lose the game because of not having enough time. > >Uri True, It's unlikely that both have optical illusions at the same time, unless they are both affected by the same wanton spirit! (seriously, there CAN be such causes imo. But people here think it is an insult to their intelligence to believe such things, so that's not a discussion for now). Is it really true that according to the rules, you can take your finger off the moved piece for up to 1/4 of a second, and then take back? S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.