Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 20:12:18 10/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 15, 2003 at 21:23:48, James T. Walker wrote:
>On October 15, 2003 at 13:48:26, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>
>>On October 15, 2003 at 13:36:27, Wayne Lowrance wrote:
>>
>>>Are you saying that rebel is the better at deep analysis ?, I have yet to see a
>>>program compare to Fritz8 in playing head to head in deep analysis such as in CC
>>>chess, but I do not own Rebel !
>>
>>i do say that hiarcs, rebel and other programs do profit more from TIME than
>>fast-searchers do.
>>
>>therefore the fast-searchers are stronger on FAST time controls such as game in
>>5, or 3'.
>>
>>but the things change when you play 40/120 or 60/60.
>
>On my XP2400+ machines, Fritz 8 and Rebel 12 have approximately the same NPS.
>So is Rebel a fast or slow searcher?
Whatever... Slow or fast searcher means absolutely nothing.
After 50 years of computer chess, it should now be obvious...
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.