Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Fine #70

Author: Ernst Walet

Date: 06:03:42 10/16/03

Go up one level in this thread


On October 16, 2003 at 06:45:31, Michel Langeveld wrote:

>On October 15, 2003 at 15:09:32, Michel Langeveld wrote:
>
>>On October 15, 2003 at 13:21:20, Gerd Isenberg wrote:
>>
>>>On October 15, 2003 at 12:37:43, Michel Langeveld wrote:
>>>
>>>>[D]8/k7/3p4/p2P1p2/P2P1P2/8/8/K7 w - -
>>>>
>>>>This position really bothers me ... and bothers nullmover...
>>>>nullmover takes a really long time to see that the pawn can be really won.
>>>>
>>>>At ply 23 we see the keymove Kb1, but it needs 26 ply after 6 minutes we see
>>>>that Kb1 wins a true pawn.
>>>>
>>>>The hashhit percentage is only 3%.
>>>>The FH is only 30%
>>>>
>>>>Do I have to be worried ... or is this still all normal?
>>>
>>>Hi Michel,
>>>
>>>no, absolutely not. There is something wrong with your hash-table.
>>>Hash-hits in IsiChess are about 70-80%, exact hits ~25%.
>>>Depth 30 with >3.00 score after 0.5 seconds on Athlon XP 2.6+.
>>
>>Thanks for the hashnumbers ... I calculated my hashhits wrong.
>>I casted to an int ... and this made it go wrong because the hashhit
>>counter is bigger as 32 bit. I cast it now to a double and I hit around 50%
>>I will calculate the exact hits also.
>>
>>>I'll hope you don't fix this severe bug until saturday ;-)
>>
>>Yes I hope to fix it also :-)
>
>The problem is complicated ... and all things in Nullmover seem to be correlated
>with not finding this move: hash, hashreplace algoritm, evaluation,
>moveordering, lazy evaluation.
>
>In order words the error is not one thing alone but a sum-up of things that
>works in the most of the positions but sub-optimal in others. And in this
>particulair position it ends up in horror.
>
>I found out that if I use:
>- an always replace algoritm
>- take away my lazy evaluation
>
>I find Kb1 on ply 22
>I get 33 ply almost instantly
>I get 40 ply in a minute with a nice score of  +2.38 score on Kb1 and Kxf5 in
>the PV.
>
>The problem with always replace is that on WAC I score only 210 out of 300 with
>2 seconds a position and else 265 / 300 on 2 seconds......
>
>still puzzling


You must be happy, two days before Leiden :)

See you there..

A passionate observer ;)

Ernst.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.