Author: Tord Romstad
Date: 06:56:59 10/16/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 16, 2003 at 08:35:54, Uri Blass wrote: >Nalimov tablebases are not very important for endgames and they are not going to >change results in most of the endgames. This depends to a great extent on the engine, I think. The experiments I have seen which conclude that tablebases have no measurable effect on playing strength have always been conducted with strong engines like Yace and Crafty, which probably play excellent endgames even without tablebases. I expect that a program with little or badly tuned endgame knowledge will profit much more from tablebases. Tord
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.