Author: Michel Langeveld
Date: 08:17:54 10/16/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 16, 2003 at 09:41:48, Steve Maughan wrote: >On suggestion would be to do depth replace everywhere except where overwriting >the same position, in which case always replace - i.e. if you find the position >in the table already always replace it with the latest version / bound, ignoring >the depth. Amir Ban suggested that this may work well for positions such as >Fine 70. It is not obviously intuative but it may work since the value of the >bound / score will be more relevant to to the current subtree. > >Anyway worth a try > >Regards, > >Steve Thanks for the advice! Do you mean with ignoring the depth: 1) let the old possibly higher depth in the hashtable or 2) always overwrite with the lowerdepth and ignore the depth already in the table Option 1) would be really not intuative.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.