Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: About blitz and long time controls

Author: Thorsten Czub

Date: 09:58:03 10/16/03

Go up one level in this thread

On October 15, 2003 at 15:01:40, Uri Blass wrote:

>I can expect significant difference after some hundreds of games between every
>program and itself with clearly faster cpu unless the program has significant
>bug and I do not know of significant bug of Tiger.
>
>Uri

ONE significant "Bug" in Tiger is IMO that is installs itself with 48 KB hash.
Most people look shallow and think : 48 MB.

And don't increase the Hash size.

if you don't use much hash, the pure mhz increase will not bring much progress
IMO.

• Re: About blitz and long time controls Uri Blass 10:16:09 10/16/03
  • Re: About blitz and long time controls Christophe Theron 11:37:33 10/16/03
    • Re: About blitz and long time controls Uri Blass 12:24:05 10/16/03
      • Re: About blitz and long time controls Christophe Theron 16:49:41 10/16/03
  • Re: About blitz and long time controls Christophe Theron 11:36:02 10/16/03

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.