Author: Uri Blass
Date: 10:16:09 10/16/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 16, 2003 at 12:58:03, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On October 15, 2003 at 15:01:40, Uri Blass wrote: > >>I can expect significant difference after some hundreds of games between every >>program and itself with clearly faster cpu unless the program has significant >>bug and I do not know of significant bug of Tiger. >> >>Uri > >ONE significant "Bug" in Tiger is IMO that is installs itself with 48 KB hash. >Most people look shallow and think : 48 MB. > >And don't increase the Hash size. > >if you don't use much hash, the pure mhz increase will not bring much progress >IMO. If the tiger on the faster hardware installed with less hash then it can explain the results. I still expect the same tiger to perform better on the faster hardware if it get the same hash on both hardwares. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.