Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 11:37:33 10/16/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 16, 2003 at 13:16:09, Uri Blass wrote:
>On October 16, 2003 at 12:58:03, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>
>>On October 15, 2003 at 15:01:40, Uri Blass wrote:
>>
>>>I can expect significant difference after some hundreds of games between every
>>>program and itself with clearly faster cpu unless the program has significant
>>>bug and I do not know of significant bug of Tiger.
>>>
>>>Uri
>>
>>ONE significant "Bug" in Tiger is IMO that is installs itself with 48 KB hash.
>>Most people look shallow and think : 48 MB.
>>
>>And don't increase the Hash size.
>>
>>if you don't use much hash, the pure mhz increase will not bring much progress
>>IMO.
>
>If the tiger on the faster hardware installed with less hash then it can explain
>the results.
>
>I still expect the same tiger to perform better on the faster hardware if it get
>the same hash on both hardwares.
>
>Uri
Naturally.
Oh, and anyway the SSDF data shows this clearly.
But why are we even talking about it?
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.