Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 23:05:52 11/08/98
Wow, miss a week -- miss a lot. That's the way I feel after catching up on reading here after a short hiatus. It's my opinion that Bruce hasn't done anything deserving of condemnation here. It's very easy for me to keep straight what is written on rec.games.chess.computer and what is written here at the computer chess club, because I haven't read rec.games.chess.computer in so long that I would forget that it existed if not for the references to it found in CCC messages from time to time. As you might imagine, as a consequence of not reading r.g.c.c., I have very little idea of what anyone is writing there. So maybe I'm missing out on some nice flame wars... gee, shucks. Oh, but now I see I am starting to find similar content here. Fantastic, I'm so excited! Yes, and I have a bridge to sell you. If people want to object to statements made in r.g.c.c., why don't they do it in r.g.c.c.? What is the point of doing it here? Is there some attempt to convert the CCC to the cesspool that r.g.c.c. had become when I left it many months (over a year?) ago? As someone who reads only CCC posts, and doesn't recieve "insider email" from anyone who is or has ever been involved in an organizational capacity with the CCC, the recent public protests of resignation seem pretty groundless to me. If Bruce has said something in r.g.c.c. that raises the ire of others, please argue about it there. I am comfortable with the job that Amir, Bruce and Don have been doing, and all three moderators have my full support. Dave Gomboc
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.