Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: I didn't know slander was allowed here.

Author: Mridul Muralidharan

Date: 12:50:33 10/16/03

Go up one level in this thread


On October 16, 2003 at 14:40:01, Christophe Theron wrote:

>On October 16, 2003 at 05:54:37, Mridul Muralidharan wrote:
>
>>On October 15, 2003 at 23:28:23, Christophe Theron wrote:
>>
>>>On October 15, 2003 at 15:32:39, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>
>>>>On October 15, 2003 at 15:16:28, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On October 15, 2003 at 14:25:40, Christophe Theron wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On October 14, 2003 at 22:37:15, Arturo Ochoa wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Instead of searching for an example of Vincent attacking somebody in a post, try
>>>>>>>>to search for the opposite example (Vincent not attacking anybody in a post).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Good luck...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>But well... We all LOVE Vincent. That must be love, as he is allowed in every
>>>>>>>>message to violate the CCC charter without being banned. Actually without even
>>>>>>>>being warned.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Peace on Earth and on CCC! :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    Christophe
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Greetings, Mr Theron.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>With all my respect that you deserves due to your strong engine. I hope you can
>>>>>>>solve the violent traffic bettween you and Vincent in the coming Dutch Open.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Vincent creates "violent traffic" between him and everybody else. There is not
>>>>>>much that can be done about it...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I dont see with good eyes, coming from the Author of a Top Engine such as Tiger,
>>>>>>>insults without a good reason.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I am still waiting your apologies from this
>>>>>>>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?319392 message  when you offended
>>>>>>>Mridul without a logic reason, underestimating his professional profile. I did
>>>>>>>not see any reason for your personal attack against him.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I cannot access to the content of this message anymore.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>What did I say? I do not remember.
>>>>>
>>>>>I do not remember exactly the words but as far as I remember
>>>>>when you supported me you said that mridul has no chess program that he
>>>>>developed or at least gave doubts about it.
>>>>>
>>>>>Uri
>>>>
>>>>I found the words in a reply to reply to reply to your post that still did not
>>>>diappear
>>>>I am not going to post a link because it is going to diappear in a short time
>>>>
>>>>Here are your words:
>>>>
>>>>>>>You are talking without knowing Uri, obviously.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You are also talking about commputer chess without really knowing, I fear.
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I guess that the second sentence is the sentence that Arturo and Vincent meant.
>>>>
>>>>Uri
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>OK, I remember that post now. And I stand by what I have said.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    Christophe
>>
>>
>>Which is ?
>>Can you elaborate so as to make your stand clear ?
>>
>>Mridul
>
>
>
>What is not clear in the post we are talking about?
>
>
>
>    Christophe


What is the part that you "And I stand by what I have said."

Considering that I cant seem to get that post by making a search in ccc archives
, I dont think I can re-post your exact words.

But the gist of your post was to seriously try to cast doubts on my abilities on
writing a chess engine without in any way trying to validate the possible truth
behind what you were insinuating.

I felt it below my standard to respond to your post at that time , but such
repeated remarks required that I speak out against it.

It maybe a different issue that you be the author of the worlds greatest or
worst chess program , but please do not take that as a license to try to
admonish others.

Without saying anything constructive in your post , you were chiding me for what
I posted - not because it was technically correct or wrong (if wrong - then
definitely it stands to reason to disprove it : and I will stand corrected and
apologise for my mistake !) - but because in your limited information , you did
not perceive that I maybe knowing what I'm talking about.

I think it was a mistake on my part to act honourably - I should have responded
back to you then and there and not expected a honourable behaviour from you.

So I would be better if you dont take it upon yourself to act as the policeman
and allow others the freedom of expressing their views freely.



Mridul



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.