Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Ruffian WB > Ruffian UCI

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 14:49:57 10/16/03

Go up one level in this thread


On October 16, 2003 at 16:03:24, Russell Reagan wrote:

>I played Ruffian in a lot of blitz games recently, and I noticed that the UCI
>version was losing matches (with well over 99% statistical reliability) to
>Crafty in 1/0 games.
>
>I checked to make sure that both engines were getting full CPU usage (dual
>machine), and I was suprised to find out that the UCI version wasn't running at
>full CPU usage all the time. Each time it was its turn to move it would drop
>down to 60-70% for a short time, then go back to 100%. Maybe this is only a
>problem in very short games.
>
>The Winboard version of Ruffian did get full CPU usage, and beat Crafty in a 1/0
>match (with over 99% statistical reliability). That's quite a difference for
>changing nothing but the communication protocol.

UCI protocol sends the complete stream of moves all the time.  It does a number
of other strange things.  Some implementations (e.g. the ChessBase adapter) do
stuff that looks nutty.

What was the interface that you were running Ruffian with?



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.