Author: Russell Reagan
Date: 16:39:59 10/16/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 16, 2003 at 17:23:21, George Tsavdaris wrote: > There is no such thing as statistical reliability. For that we have to play an >infinite number of games. Of course we can define a number like 0.95 or 0.99, >for the statistical reliability a result must reach, to be satisfied and say >that engine A is stronger than B. > So every tournament is not wothless but only less reliable from another. That's what I meant. The tournaments of a few dozen rounds are rarely statistically reliable to 95% or higher.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.