Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 02:54:39 11/09/98
Go up one level in this thread
> Ed in the past i have imagined the possibility of two programs(Engines) >working in unison to produce a stonger program. Indeed i believe that this >merger between Rebel and Tiger can be a fruitful one. However i think that it >is faulty for you NOT to attempt the straightforward multi engine feature such >as Fritz, Millenium and Junior have for this reason. Indeed if you create a >program that you CAN SHOW to be the absolute strongest then yes it will sell, at >least until it is overtaken by another program. And that program might even be >an engine for fritz or millenium. If it is, then the owners of Fritz or Mill >will have the strongest programs plus the FANTASTIC feature of other >engines(hiarcs, nimzo etc). It is true that people want to have the strongest >program, but it is my oppinion that MOST people are more interested in a variety >of playing styles(multiple engines). The ease of moving from one chess program >to another without having to start up an entirely different program is EXTREMELY >attractive. I read on the gambit soft page "Do people really want to keep >looking at the same GUI" as if that would bore them, well i'm sorry to say no >they are not going to get tired of the interface because the MOST IMPORTANT >thing is the moves produced, not what a prog looks like. Besides that i could >look at the fritz GUI for the next 20 years and be happy with just the few >engines i have now. >You are fallling into Henry Fords trap(founder of ford automotive)- He wouldn't >go with the times and start adding fancy features and colors to the Model T car, >because he said people will always take price and quality over frills. A few >years later GM(general motors) was the top manufacturer in the world, despite >the fact that Ford had more capital and previously a monopoly. This is because >they offered color and frills, because that's what people want. The problem >with you however i don't think you will survive like Ford automotive has. You >do not have time to wait to start getting into the multi engine market. If you >had included the possibility of multi engines in Rebel(besises earlie versions >of rebel) i'm sure it would have sold 30% more than it has currently. Based on my own information I can say the "engines" are hot here in CCC but that most people simply in the end pick (prefer) one program. Of course the REBEL-TIGER approach will end-up as separate engines too in a Windows environment but the extra will be that we will try to join forces in: a) exchanging ideas to make both engines stronger. b) try to create an automatic referee (3-HIRN approach) At the moment we investigate if there is a (very) quick way to include Chess Tiger in Rebel10 as an engine (same approach as loading older Rebel engines). If it turns out this will cost months we will drop it and focus on Windows. - Ed -
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.