Author: Uri Blass
Date: 10:03:17 10/17/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 17, 2003 at 12:27:32, Thomas Mayer wrote: >Hi Will, > >>[D]7k/8/2R1pn2/1p1r2p1/p6p/P4P2/1P3BPP/7K b - - bm Rd1+ > >Quark has also it's problems to find the solution: > >Quark 2.20beta on Athlon MP1800+ > >00:00:00 d->05 -0.58 d5e5 c6c8 h8g7 g2g3 g5g4 f3g4 >00:00:00 d->06 -0.52 d5d2 f2e3 d2b2 c6c8 h8g7 e3g5 b5b4 >00:00:00 d->07 -0.44 d5d2 f2g1 d2b2 c6e6 h8g7 e6e7 g7g6 g1d4 >00:00:00 d->08 -0.33 d5d2 f2e3 d2e2 e3d4 e2e1 d4g1 g5g4 f3g4 f6g4 c6c7 g4f3 >00:00:01 d->09 -0.40 d5d2 f2g1 d2e2 c6b6 e2e5 b6b8 h8g7 g1f2 e5e2 f2d4 e2e3 >00:00:02 d->10 -0.58 d5d2 f2g1 h8g7 c6e6 g7g6 e6b6 h4h3 g2h3 d2b2 g1c5 >00:00:04 d->10 -0.57 d5e5! >00:00:05 d->10 -0.49 d5e5 h1g1 h8g7 g1f1 g7g6 g2g4 h4h3 c6c8 e5d5 f1e2 g3h2 >00:00:07 d->11 -0.49 d5e5 h1g1 h8g7 g1f1 g7g6 f2b6 g6f5 g2g4 f5g6 c6c8 e5d5 >f1e2 >00:00:16 d->12 -0.45 d5e5 h1g1 h8g7 g1f1 g7g6 g2g3 h4h3 c6d6 g6f7 d6d8 e5d5 >d8c8 >00:00:31 d->13 -0.44 d5e5 h1g1 h8g7 g1f1 g7f7 g2g3 h4h3 f2c5 e5d5 c5e3 f7e7 >c6c7 e7d6 c7c8 >00:01:02 d->14 -0.47 d5e5 h1g1 h8g7 g1f1 g7f7 g2g4 e5d5 f2e3 d5e5 f1f2 e5d5 >f2g2 >00:02:23 d->15 -0.47 d5e5 h1g1 h8g7 f2d4 e5d5 d4e3 g7f7 >00:02:33 d->15 -0.46 d5d1! >00:03:01 d->15 -0.02 d5d1 f2g1 f6h5 c6e6 h5f4 e6e7 >00:03:56 d->16 +0.11 d5d1 f2g1 f6h5 c6e6 h5f4 e6e8 h8g7 h2h3 g7h6 e8e5 d1b1 >e5e8 b1b2 e8h8 h6g6 h8g8 g6f5 g8f8 f5e6 g1e3 e6e5 > >besides I am quite impressed by the newest Amateurs - especially the depth they >are reaching is usually 2 plys deeper then Quark... What special trick is going >on here - or is this MPC ? Any hints apreciated... :) > >Greets, Thomas I think that plies may be misleading. Do these amateurs score better than quark at test suite at long time control? Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.