Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Node frequencies, and a flame

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 13:30:16 10/17/03

Go up one level in this thread


From:
http://www.kurzweilai.net/articles/art0134.html?printable=1

"It's obvious what the sixth paradigm will be after Moore's Law runs out of
steam during the second decade of this century. Chips today are flat (although
it does require up to 20 layers of material to produce one layer of circuitry).
Our brain, in contrast, is organized in three dimensions. We live in a three
dimensional world, why not use the third dimension? The human brain actually
uses a very inefficient electrochemical digital controlled analog computational
process. The bulk of the calculations are done in the interneuronal connections
at a speed of only about 200 calculations per second (in each connection), which
is about ten million times slower than contemporary electronic circuits. But the
brain gains its prodigious powers from its extremely parallel organization in
three dimensions. There are many technologies in the wings that build circuitry
in three dimensions. Nanotubes, for example, which are already working in
laboratories, build circuits from pentagonal arrays of carbon atoms. One cubic
inch of nanotube circuitry would be a million times more powerful than the human
brain. There are more than enough new computing technologies now being
researched, including three-dimensional silicon chips, optical computing,
crystalline computing, DNA computing, and quantum computing, to keep the law of
accelerating returns as applied to computation going for a long time.

Thus the (double) exponential growth of computing is broader than Moore's Law,
which refers to only one of its paradigms. And this accelerating growth of
computing is, in turn, part of the yet broader phenomenon of the accelerating
pace of any evolutionary process. Observers are quick to criticize
extrapolations of an exponential trend on the basis that the trend is bound to
run out of "resources." The classical example is when a species happens upon a
new habitat (e.g., rabbits in Australia), the species' numbers will grow
exponentially for a time, but then hit a limit when resources such as food and
space run out.

But the resources underlying the exponential growth of an evolutionary process
are relatively unbounded:

(i) The (ever growing) order of the evolutionary process itself. Each stage of
evolution provides more powerful tools for the next. In biological evolution,
the advent of DNA allowed more powerful and faster evolutionary "experiments."
Later, setting the "designs" of animal body plans during the Cambrian explosion
allowed rapid evolutionary development of other body organs such as the brain.
Or to take a more recent example, the advent of computer assisted design tools
allows rapid development of the next generation of computers.
(ii) The "chaos" of the environment in which the evolutionary process takes
place and which provides the options for further diversity. In biological
evolution, diversity enters the process in the form of mutations and ever
changing environmental conditions. In technological evolution, human ingenuity
combined with ever changing market conditions keep the process of innovation
going."



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.