Author: Jeremiah Penery
Date: 17:29:41 10/17/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 15, 2003 at 10:44:02, Tony Werten wrote: >On October 14, 2003 at 20:13:12, Jeremiah Penery wrote: > >>On October 14, 2003 at 14:14:17, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>3822 kppppppk 00030000 18216798468 -- -- -- -- >>>3823 knpppppk 00068000 149906121948 -- -- -- -- >>>3824 knnppppk 000A0000 510827085900 -- -- -- -- >>>3825 knnnpppk 000D8000 922888768444 -- -- -- -- >>>3826 knnnnppk 00110000 932539520220 -- -- -- -- >>>3827 knnnnnpk 00148000 499799737764 -- -- -- -- >>>3828 knnnnnnk 00180000 28401227778 -- -- -- -- >>>3829 kbpppppk 00228000 149906121948 -- -- -- -- >>>3830 kbnppppk 00260000 1021654171800 -- -- -- -- >>>3831 kbnnpppk 00298000 2768666305332 -- -- -- -- >> >>Why would you even bother with ones like these? I'm not going to bother with >>the calculations, but I'm sure you could save a TON of space by eliminating >>useless/unneeded/impossible piece sets from that list. > >I'm afraid not. These silly one will be "small" compared to the usefull ones and >won't really matter. Look at the number of positions listed for those, and figure the total number of 'useless' configurations. It might not be a huge fraction of the total, but it's still a huge number by itself.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.