Author: Uri Blass
Date: 19:02:52 10/17/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 17, 2003 at 17:30:33, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On October 17, 2003 at 17:02:43, swaminathan natarajan wrote: > >>what about tablebases? YOU need it ! >>is it required? YES >>what r the different tablebases available and which requires less space to >>download? > >during the starting of the game till the middle game it played really well >but finally at last >very rapidly(without consuming 1 or 2 seconds for 10 moves)but it has almost 1 >min in its clock >then why does it play very rapidly without analyzing and then blundered making >moves and finally lost the game(mostly happened only at endings) > >BECAUSE YOU ARE NOT USING THE TABLEBASES, THAT IS WHY IT BLUNDERED AT SUCH FAST >TIME CONTROL :-) No The mistakes of searching to depth 2 has nothing to do with missing tablebases. Tablebases were not relevant in the game. Uri > >The reason why Shredder 704 UCI plays rapidly is because it is trying NOT to >loose on time, but at the same time it blundered because at such fast time >control it is almost impossible to calculate the exact winning line for a >complicated endgame, but with the Nalimov Tablebases it will not blunder and it >will always select the best move. > >Pichard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.