Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 20:10:08 10/17/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 17, 2003 at 22:02:52, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 17, 2003 at 17:30:33, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On October 17, 2003 at 17:02:43, swaminathan natarajan wrote: >> >>>what about tablebases? YOU need it ! >>>is it required? YES >>>what r the different tablebases available and which requires less space to >>>download? >> >>during the starting of the game till the middle game it played really well >>but finally at last >>very rapidly(without consuming 1 or 2 seconds for 10 moves)but it has almost 1 >>min in its clock >>then why does it play very rapidly without analyzing and then blundered making >>moves and finally lost the game(mostly happened only at endings) >> >>BECAUSE YOU ARE NOT USING THE TABLEBASES, THAT IS WHY IT BLUNDERED AT SUCH FAST >>TIME CONTROL :-) > >No > >The mistakes of searching to depth 2 has nothing to do with missing tablebases. >Tablebases were not relevant in the game. >Uri >> The mistake of searching to depth 2 has something to do with his settings, since mine searches to depth 10 under the same time control. I don't know how he installed Shredder 704 under Arena 0.947, but I am NOT having the same problem that he is having :-) Pichard >>The reason why Shredder 704 UCI plays rapidly is because it is trying NOT to >>loose on time, but at the same time it blundered because at such fast time >>control it is almost impossible to calculate the exact winning line for a >>complicated endgame, but with the Nalimov Tablebases it will not blunder and it >>will always select the best move. >> >>Pichard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.