Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 21:30:43 10/17/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 17, 2003 at 23:10:08, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On October 17, 2003 at 22:02:52, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On October 17, 2003 at 17:30:33, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On October 17, 2003 at 17:02:43, swaminathan natarajan wrote: >>> >>>>what about tablebases? YOU need it ! >>>>is it required? YES >>>>what r the different tablebases available and which requires less space to >>>>download? >>> >>>during the starting of the game till the middle game it played really well >>>but finally at last >>>very rapidly(without consuming 1 or 2 seconds for 10 moves)but it has almost 1 >>>min in its clock >>>then why does it play very rapidly without analyzing and then blundered making >>>moves and finally lost the game(mostly happened only at endings) >>> >>>BECAUSE YOU ARE NOT USING THE TABLEBASES, THAT IS WHY IT BLUNDERED AT SUCH FAST >>>TIME CONTROL :-) >> >>No >> >>The mistakes of searching to depth 2 has nothing to do with missing tablebases. >>Tablebases were not relevant in the game. >>Uri >>> > >The mistake of searching to depth 2 has something to do with his settings, since >mine searches to depth 10 under the same time control. I don't know how he >installed Shredder 704 under Arena 0.947, but I am NOT having the same problem >that he is having :-) > PS: He simply needs to install the setup Shredder classic patch modified: Friday, June 13, 2003, 11:04:24 PM >Pichard > > > >>>The reason why Shredder 704 UCI plays rapidly is because it is trying NOT to >>>loose on time, but at the same time it blundered because at such fast time >>>control it is almost impossible to calculate the exact winning line for a >>>complicated endgame, but with the Nalimov Tablebases it will not blunder and it >>>will always select the best move. >>> >>>Pichard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.